Skip to main content

Tim Masters, boy genius: The government is evil

Becky Akers documents the life of a promising young man, Tim Masters, destroyed by agents of the state - for ego's sake. I challenge you to read the article from beginning to end, and check her links to background materials. When you finish, if you do not believe that the government is evil, I want to understand how you come to this conclusion. Is it because you believe we need to break a few eggs in order to make the omelet? What is it that you think justifies empowering a special class of men - "employees of the state" - to make false accusations and imprison a man, without any evidence against him, for two decades?

Of course, I'm sure the apologists for the state will be quick to point to the twelve jurors. But it is becoming more and more clear that 12 jurors are no longer sufficient protection from the wiles of the state. Our prisons are swollen with people convicted of non-crimes and many wrongfully convicted innocents. 1 in 100 Americans are in jail or prison. The police investigators and state prosecutors have perfected the art of using cheap tricks like the prisoner's dilemma and the plea bargain to turn the whole process into little more than a traveling circus.

It's time to wake up people. Your fond memories of the friendly small-town cop who even helped change a flat tire on occasion are incongruent with the emerging SWAT-team police-state. We must end the state monopoly on the provision of law and justice before we destroy our social fabric with injustice and state crimes. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Constitution has gone to the dogs

Actually, it should have gone to the dogs, but didn't. I'm talking about  Leona Helmsley's estate , of course. The contract clause of the Constitution says, "No State shall ... pass any ... Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts..." This means that private contracts cannot be changed by legislative edict. This clause is incredibly important because the willingness of private individuals to engage in profitable enterprise - which is the foundation of social welfare - crucially depends on their belief that they can realize a profit. In turn, their belief that they can realize a profit depends on their belief that they can hold parties to a contract liable to the terms in the contract. For example, lenders must have confidence that they can repossess the collateral for a loan if the loan is defaulted on. Otherwise, they will not take the risk of giving the loan in the first place. When lenders are too scared to lend, everyone is worse off. In the case of Leona Hel...
2 comments
Read more
So, I spent all weekend watching JFK assassination videos and doing armchair JFK assassination research. Here are my notes: 1) Most of the debate seems to rage around trying to get evidence or proof that JFK's assassination was a conspiracy. This is silly because it grants - from the outset - the bizarre assumption made by the official theories that political figures are as likely to die at the hands of "mad attention-seekers" as they are to be assassinated by their enemies who actually stand to benefit. How many people are insane enough to think that the electric chair is a fair trade for "being remembered" by history, even if in infamy? And of those people how many are resourceful enough to pierce the security perimeter of the President of the United States? Kennedy was threatened by Richard Pavlick in 1960 after Nixon lost the election and, by all accounts, Pavlick was a lone nut. But all we know of his "assassination attempts" are his own tall tale...
1 comment
Read more

What Law Is

Law What is law? Frederic Bastiat, in his treatise The Law, defines law as the collective use of force. As much as I love Bastiat’s treatise, I think his definition is not sufficiently analytical. It is certainly the case that the law plays a role in the collective use of force but the law is something more basic than this. We can begin by looking at law as it is today. The website for the Oregon courts has an excellent summary [1] of modern law and courts. I will quote it at length: Throughout history, people have had disputes and have needed some means to settle their disputes. As civil societies develop, they need an orderly system of conflict resolution. One system that developed in "western" cultures is the "law court" or court of law. In England, those early law courts developed a "body of law" called the common law, which defined both the rights of the people and the government and the duties people owe each other and their government. T...
2 comments
Read more